An Initiative has been taken to institute informal judicial CIC's decision on High Court fees -system at the village level. These courts will not be constraints by following the CCP and the EA and deal with the case involving claims/offences punishable upto 1 lakh.
Appeal filed by the Union of India against the order of CIC in the case of Shri SC Aggarwal who filed an RTI application to the President’s Secretariat and Dept of Justice, Union of India to get the information on the appointment of the Justice Vijendra Jain as Chief Justice of Punjab & Haryana High Court. He was refused the information and later filed an appeal to CIC wherein the CIC allowed the appeal and asked the Union of India to give the information. The Union of India moved to the Delhi High Court on the grounds that the Dept of Justice is in fiduciary relationship with the collegium of judges and will not be able to give such information to the third party. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of Shri SC Aggarwal for the vacation of the stay.
There was a time when the Courts in India , particularly the Supreme Court waxed eloquent about the “Right to Information”, being a part of the Constitutionally enshrined right to speech and expression. Thus, while rejecting the government’s claim of…
A Transparency International report released on Thursday says that 77 per cent of respondents in a survey in India believe the judiciary is corrupt.
The first-ever impeachment motion against a SC judge, Justice V. Ramaswami, was signed by 108 MPs in 1991.
This charge sheet was prepared by the Committee on Judicial Accountability in 1998, when Justice Punchhi was a judge of the Supreme Court of India.
Serious allegations of corruption and favouritism were raised against Justice A.S.Anand former Chief Justice of India
Name of Judge: Justice Vijendra Jain Post held at the relevant time: Judge at Delhi High Court Currrent Status: Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court Analysis/Comment/Critique: Justice Vijender Jain had decided a case of a litigant Hari Ram…
Name of Judge: Justice Ashok Kumar Rank: Additional Judge Court: High Court of Chennai Analysis/Comment/Critique: The case of Judge Ashok Kumar of Madras who was formerly a session’s judge and has been given a permanent position in the Chennai High…
This is the case where the documentary evidence was available to show that the judge has purchased the property worth crores in few lakhs in the name of his wife from well-known criminal who have illegally grabbed the land. There were inquiry reports of the Additional District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police which attested to these facts. However, despite this documentary evidence being brought to the notice of the then Chief Justice of India, he neither ordered an independent investigation nor did he allow the Committee on Judicial Accountability to get a regular FIR registered, so that a normal police investigation could have taken place. This was despite the fact that under the in-house procedure, supposedly adopted by the Supreme Court of India in 1999 for investigating charges against the judges, at least an in-house committee of judges could have formed to investigate the charges against Justice Bhalla. However instead of doing that, the then Chief Justice Y.K. Sabbarwal recommended Justice Bhalla to be the Chief Justice of Kerala High Court.