Background paper for the Convention on Judicial Accountability held on July 26, 2003
{edocs}background_paper_of_Convenion_on_Jud_Acc _26.7.03.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}background_paper_of_Convenion_on_Jud_Acc _26.7.03.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}COJA Resolution 13.12.02.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}COJA Resolution 4.12.02.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}COJA Resolution 28.11.02.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}coja_resolution_22.9.01.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}5th NC COJA 1999.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}4th NC COJA 1996.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}3rd NC COJA 1993.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}2nd NC COJA 1992.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
{edocs}1st NC COJA 1991.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}

Former Supreme Court Chief Justice YK Sabharwal was involved in dubious judicial deal-making that earned his sons huge profits. So says a group of engaged and credible citizens led by former Law Minister Shanti Bhushan. And they have evidence to back their claims. Sanjay Dubey pieces together their case

Former law Minister Shanti Bhushan tells Harinder Baweja that the shopkeepers who suffered because of the sealing drive should file a suit for damages against former Chief Justice YK Sabharwal

ON AUGUST 3, a group of eminent citizens called a press conference in Delhi. They had an explosive story to share. A story that impacted thousands. A story that raised questions about judicial accountability few ever dare to raise.

Are CJIs following rules in appointment of judges? SC Seeks Details Of All Appointments Since 1999
The issue of accountability of the higher judiciary has long been troubling all sections of society. While the power of the higher judiciary has greatly increased over the years because of the poor popular perception of the political class, which the judiciary has used to enhance the scope of its actions, its accountability has been gradually reduced.
{edocs}documents_on_sabharwal.pdf,650,600,link{/edocs}
New Delhi: In an action that could open a Pandora’s box, the Supreme Court on Monday sought data from the Centre to scrutinise whether the Chief Justices of India have followed legal procedure in appointment of additional judges to various high courts since 1999 and their confirmation.
New Delhi: The Supreme Court will examine whether consultations by the Chief Justice of India with other judges in the collegium had been disregarded in the appointment of Ashok Kumar as a permanent Judge of the Madras High Court.